COMPARISON · April 8, 2026 · 8 min read
MigrationFox vs CloudM: 2026 Comparison
MigrationFox and CloudM both help organizations move data between cloud platforms, but they take very different approaches. MigrationFox is a pay-per-GB self-service tool built for file and document migrations across 11 platforms. CloudM is a per-license migration suite with deep expertise in Google Workspace and Microsoft 365 email migrations. This guide breaks down the differences so you can choose the right tool for your project.
Comparison Table
| Feature | MigrationFox | CloudM |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing Model | $0.50 CAD/GB — pay as you go | Per-license (per user/mailbox) |
| Free Tier | 2 GB included | Free trial (limited) |
| Platform Count | 11 (SharePoint, Google Drive, Dropbox, Box, S3, Azure Blob, SFTP, SMB, Teams, Slack, Egnyte) | Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, Dropbox, Box, and others |
| Primary Focus | File & document migration | Email, calendar, contacts & file migration |
| Self-Service Setup | Yes — start in minutes | Yes — admin console |
| Email Migration | No | Yes — core strength |
| InfoPath Archive | Yes — XML-to-PDF conversion | No |
| On-Prem Agent | Yes — Windows agent for SMB/file shares | No |
| Auto-Split (Parallelism) | Yes — large jobs split automatically | Not available |
| Permission Migration | Yes | Yes |
| Delta Sync | Yes | Yes |
| Compliance Pages | No | Yes — HIPAA, NIS2, SOC 2 |
| Track Record | Newer product | 80M+ migrations completed |
Pricing
MigrationFox charges $0.50 CAD per GB transferred, with no per-user fees or license commitments. You pay only for what you move, and 2 GB is included free so you can test before committing budget.
CloudM uses a per-license pricing model, where you purchase a license for each user or mailbox you migrate. This works well for email-centric projects where user count is the natural unit, but can become expensive for file-heavy migrations where a few users own large volumes of data.
Platform Support
MigrationFox connects to 11 platforms: SharePoint Online, Google Drive (including Shared Drives), Dropbox, Box, Amazon S3, Azure Blob Storage, SFTP, SMB/Windows file shares, Microsoft Teams, Slack, and Egnyte. The focus is on file and document migration across a wide range of sources and destinations.
CloudM is strongest on Google Workspace and Microsoft 365. It covers email, calendar, contacts, and files in those ecosystems, and supports additional platforms like Dropbox and Box. If your migration is primarily Google-to-Microsoft or Microsoft-to-Google, CloudM covers all workloads in a single license.
MigrationFox Advantages
- Pay-per-GB pricing — no license commitment; ideal for projects where data volume varies per user
- 11 platform connectors — broader coverage for mixed-platform environments
- InfoPath Archive — convert InfoPath XML forms to PDF before the July 2026 retirement
- Windows agent for on-prem — migrate directly from SMB file shares without uploading to an intermediary
- Auto-split technology — large jobs automatically parallelize for faster throughput
- 2 GB free — test your migration before spending anything
CloudM Advantages
- 80M+ migrations completed — proven at scale with a long track record
- Strong Google Workspace expertise — deep integration with Google admin tools
- Email migration — migrate mailboxes, calendars, and contacts alongside files
- Industry compliance documentation — published HIPAA, NIS2, and SOC 2 compliance pages
- All-in-one Google/Microsoft migration — single tool covers email + files + calendar in one license
Best For
Choose MigrationFox if:
- Your migration is primarily files and documents (not email)
- You work across multiple platforms (e.g., Dropbox to SharePoint, S3 to Google Drive, SMB to Teams)
- You want transparent pay-per-GB pricing with no license minimums
- You need to archive InfoPath forms before the SharePoint retirement deadline
- You need to move data from on-premises file shares
Choose CloudM if:
- Your migration is Google Workspace to Microsoft 365 (or the reverse)
- You need to migrate email, calendars, and contacts alongside files
- You require published compliance documentation (HIPAA, NIS2)
- You want a tool with a long enterprise track record
Summary
MigrationFox and CloudM serve different sweet spots. For file-focused, mixed-platform migrations with transparent per-GB pricing, MigrationFox is the more flexible and cost-effective choice. For full-workload Google-to-Microsoft migrations that include email and calendars, CloudM's all-in-one approach is hard to beat. The best way to decide is to test both — MigrationFox offers 2 GB free so you can run a pilot with your own data.